难道是钱多烧的？
@hicharlie
发信人: hicharlie (马上诗人), 信区: Aero
标  题: Re: Re:苏57的机动性很强，但是在5代机的时代，用一张图来评价
发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 14 17:13:57 2024), 站内

想换吧，不要太神话J20了，美军国会质询认为F16就足以应付了。
--
修改:abb FROM 123.127.143.*
FROM 123.127.143.*

我就转发一下，搞军工的继续努力。美军多次和J20打交道。按照他们的评估。
Despite a lot of pompous claims, the J-20 turned out to be about as stealthy as the Super Hornet. In the US we call that "low observance", not stealth. China doesn't have sufficiently sophisticated manufacturing to produce the kind of anti-radar coatings the US uses.
--
FROM 111.198.72.*

灯塔身体比嘴巴诚实

【 在 hicharlie 的大作中提到: 】
: 标  题: Re: hicharlie你说为啥usaaf要给f22添加隐身吊舱、油箱？
: 发信站: 水木社区 (Fri Nov 15 15:48:23 2024), 站内
:
: 我就转发一下，搞军工的继续努力。美军多次和J20打交道。按照他们的评估。
: Despite a lot of pompous claims, the J-20 turned out to be about as stealthy as the Super Hornet. In the US we call that "low observance", not stealth. China doesn't have sufficiently sophisticated manufacturing to produce the kind of anti-radar coatings
: the US uses.
: --
:
: ※ 来源:·水木社区 http://www.mysmth.net·[FROM: 111.198.72.*]
--
FROM 123.127.143.*

太棒了，我真的太同意了。
不过为啥你说的是F-16？

【 在 hicharlie 的大作中提到: 】
: 我就转发一下，搞军工的继续努力。美军多次和J20打交道。按照他们的评估。
: Despite a lot of pompous claims, the J-20 turned out to be about as stealthy as the Super Hornet. In the US we call that "low observance", not stealth. China doesn't have sufficiently sophisticated manufacturing to produce the kind of anti-radar coatings the US uses.
--
FROM 114.254.173.*