这个例子太好了
【 在 Psychnp 的大作中提到: 】
: No, quantum physics does not disprove causality.
: On the contrary, our best working quantum theory to date, quantum field theory, quite properly respects causality both on the macroscopic and on the microscopic level. Acausal (faster-than-light, backwards-in-time) influences are explicitly and precisely canceled out in the theory. This, in fact, is one of the major motivations behind quantum field theory.
: Some confusion arises because of misunderstandings surrounding the obvious nonlocality of the quantum theory, in particular the nonlocality of quantum entanglement. Therefore, it is important to reiterate that although entanglement may be counterintuitive, “spooky” even, it does not imply the transmission of information, the transmission of energy or momentum or other influences. It is simply a nonlocal manifestation of conservation laws, but no acausal signaling is involved.
: ...................
--
FROM 14.150.198.*

也赞hut，理由是引用严肃正经的文献，
【 在 junesilly 的大作中提到: 】
: 给psy赞一个
: 这才是讨论问题的样子
:
--
FROM 14.150.137.*

赞，我相反，完全没有这个耐心。也不知道他的楼在哪，听他多次说了
【 在 junesilly 的大作中提到: 】
: 楼太高
: 能直接告诉我楼层吗？
: 我做什么都比较认真
: ...................
--
FROM 14.150.137.*

是不是这个
https://www.mysmth.net/nForum/#!article/Bull/1946365
【 在 junesilly 的大作中提到: 】
: 你说半天等于没说
:
--
FROM 14.150.137.*

靠这个套牢了迷妹？
【 在 fadels 的大作中提到: 】
: 你就说你让他改的什么吧  糊弄这种玄虚唬迷妹可以
--
FROM 14.150.137.*