。。。这个不就是bing搜索recognition的第一个搜索结果吗。

点开就是个论坛上一个匿名用户的回答，下面还有好几个匿名用户也说得有声有色，权威毛线，他都没有点开链接仔细看就搬过来了。




【 在 shouge111 的大作中提到: 】
:
: 嗯，你这个是权威回答了
:
: 【 在 Qlala 的大作中提到: 】
: : For native English speakers recognition is the only word that exists. Recognization is a word invented by scientists (probably not native English speakers) who have no proper knowledge of the English language. Recognization can only exist if you accept the existence of the word cognization. In the same way the verb will have to be recognizate.

#发自zSMTH@LYA-AL00
--
FROM 113.70.183.*

单词找本牛津，朗文，柯林斯查一下就行了，没必要靠猜。

这个词是因为非英语母语的人，习惯性在动词加-ation后缀派生成动词，习惯性搞错的。没必要搞出来莫名奇妙的解释。

【 在 shouge111 的大作中提到: 】
:
: 哦，我也感觉科技文献中应该有这个单词啊
: 好像这第一条回答蛮合理的
:
: 【 在 Oriphia 的大作中提到: 】

#发自zSMTH@LYA-AL00
--
FROM 113.70.183.*

区别在于后者没人用。下面给你贴个native speaker的看法以及一个抬杠的：

For native English speakers recognition is the only word that exists. Recognization is a word invented by scientists (probably not native English speakers) who have no proper knowledge of the English language. Recognization can only exist if you accept the existence of the word cognization. In the same way the verb will have to be recognizate.
15th November 2006
anonymous
Just a clarification:
Recognization is a historically valid variation of Recognition (there are quotes from the early 1700s using it). As English speakers got lazy, the longer form became obsolete to the point that some people deny its existence.
It was not "invented" recently, nor was it indicative of "not native English speakers." Claims of that sort are unsubstantiated, and anyone blindly insisting that recognition is the "only" form of the word is a militant reactionary in denial of historical reality.
2nd March 2007
anonymous
【 在 shouge111 的大作中提到: 】
--
FROM 223.72.91.*