毕竟黄毛MI BOY的数量就那么多，后面肯定要下降的。
汽车事故死亡率行业平均值是10万分之1.5，SU7是万分之一，差不多6倍了。
其中：
2025.01 吉林辽源 1
2025.01 浙江慈溪 1
2025.01 广东东莞 1
2025.01 江西九江 2
2025.01 四川自贡 7
2025.02 河南某地 5
2025.03 福建泉州 1
2025.03 安徽池州 3
2025.04 广东徐闻 2
2025.04 四川某地 1
2025.06 河南商丘 2
这还是只是网上有报道的，实际数据肯定更难看。

现在呢，YU7又发明了主线路使用铝线的壮举，你说牛逼不牛逼吧。
【 在 linq123 的大作中提到: 】
: 杂粮粉口中的一米打五界呢
: 发自「快看水母 于 TAS-AN00」
--
FROM 106.38.119.*

你自己看吧。

Okay, let's proceed with the assumption that the data "Mi Motors has approximately 1 death per 10,000 owners" is accurate, and that car ownership does not exceed one year.

Given these strong assumptions, comparing this brand's safety with others becomes quite challenging, but we can still explore what this hypothetical data might imply.

Extremely High Rate: A death rate of 1 per 10,000 vehicles in a single year of ownership is, in a word, exceptionally high when compared to established automotive safety benchmarks.

Here's how Mi Motors' assumed rate of 1 death per 10,000 vehicles (per year) would compare:

    Global/Developed Markets: In countries with high vehicle safety standards (like the US, EU, or Japan), the average death rate per 10,000 registered vehicles per year is typically much lower than 1. For instance, in the US, the death rate per 10,000 registered vehicles has been around 1.5 to 2.0 for all vehicles on the road, including older, less safe models, and covering all miles driven. If a new car brand's annual rate for just one year of ownership is 1 per 10,000, that suggests a significantly higher risk profile. Some estimates put this figure closer to 0.5 or less for newer vehicles or top-performing brands.

    Specific Models/Brands: When safety organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) in the US publish "driver death rates," they often report figures in the range of 0 to 30 deaths per million registered vehicle years for specific models. Converting that to "per 10,000" would be 0 to 0.3 deaths per 10,000 registered vehicle years. Even the least safe models rarely exceed 0.5 deaths per 10,000 registered vehicles per year.

Conclusion based on hypothetical comparison:

If Mi Motors genuinely has a rate of 1 death per 10,000 vehicles within their first year of ownership, this would position it as an outlier with a significantly higher accident fatality rate compared to almost all established mainstream and luxury automotive brands

【 在 eventvwr 的大作中提到: 】
: 那你那个小米的事故率是行业平均值的6倍是你基于常识算出来的吗？
--
FROM 106.38.119.*

普及？真是笑死了。
就说个简单的事：家用电线有用铝线的吗？
【 在 i925XE 的大作中提到: 】
: 新能源汽车高压用铝线早就普及了
--
FROM 106.38.119.*

如果问届这么做，问届也是垃圾。
不过根据我的了解，问届在主干线上用的是铜线，所以比粗粮好些。
粗粮YU7可是除了最高配，几乎都用的是铝线。
你要能接受就赶紧买吧，我绝对支持你。
【 在 i925XE 的大作中提到: 】
: 问界早就用高压铝导线了，宁德时代和比亚迪电池包里的高压母排也是铝排
--
FROM 106.38.119.*

上面的数据，之前都是别的网友网友发的截图，我看过好几次了。
后面我贴到水木，有网友就说这个明显有问题，我去搜了一下，还真有，就增加了最后一行的数据。
【 在 huangk 的大作中提到: 】
: 死了这么多人可要考证清楚
: 不能瞎讲
: 这种没充足的证据，会惹大麻烦的  
: ...................
--
FROM 106.38.119.*