这篇文章本身没什么问题，但是并不能说明FSD不好！
如果要更客观的去评价FSD，一个是 跟其他竞争对手的自动驾驶对比，一个是跟他自己的历史进化速度对比，才能看到FSD目前的真实情况。
FSD虽然离完全自动驾驶还有比较长的距离，但其自动驾驶水平一定是领先的，进化速度也是惊人的。
12英里接管一次，本身这个数据也是很优秀的。
【 在 qtpr 的大作中提到: 】
: Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology has long been hyped as the next big thing in the automotive world. While Tesla CEO Elon Musk often touts the system's capabilities, independent testing and data have often painted a more sobering picture. Now, a new evaluation by AMCI Testing, an independent automotive testing firm, has further exposed the limitations of Tesla's FSD, raising significant questions about its readiness for widespread deployment.
: AMCI's testing, conducted over 1,000 miles in a 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance equipped with Hardware 4 and running FSD versions 12.5.1 and 12.5.3, revealed a disconcerting reality: human intervention was required on average once every 13 miles. This translates to over 75 interventions during the testing period, far exceeding the expectations of even the most critical FSD observers.
: The findings stand in stark contrast to crowdsourced data, which suggested a much higher average distance between disengagements. While AMCI acknowledges that Tesla's FSD system is impressive in its ability to mimic human-like driving behaviors, especially for a camera-based system, it also warns against the dangers of complacency.
: ...................
--
FROM 123.121.56.*