『521』子曰：「甯武子，邦有道，則知；邦無道，則愚。其知可及也；其愚不可及也。」
　　　　※春文斋：帮有道，尽心竭智助君治国，死而后已；邦无道当尽心尽力智谏，装蠢虽可保身，然终非君子也。君子杀身成仁，岂愚忠之徒哉？《论语注疏》邢昺疏：“若遇邦国有道则显其知谋，若遇无道则韬藏其知而佯愚。”此正解，但朱熹在《论语集注》中出于纲常愚忠之理的观点，与邢昺正相反：“按春秋传，武子仕卫，当文公、成公之时，文公有道，而武子无事可见，此其知之可及也。成公无道，至于失国，而武子周旋其闲，尽心竭力，不避艰险。”
　　　　James Legge《The Analects of Confucius》：
　　　　　　The Master said, "When good order prevailed in his country, Ning Wu acted the part of a wise man. When his country was in disorder, he acted the part of a stupid man. Others may equal his wisdom, but they cannot equal his stupidity."
　　　　　　“有道”是合乎道德，合乎治国理念，秩序当然主导着社会，“good order prevailed”。但有秩序未必等于“邦有道”，道路以目也无人敢造次。
　　　　　　可以说是“acted Stupid man”，但不能说成“acted wise man”，智者是装不出来的，不如用“show his wisdon”。
--
修改:chunzai FROM 156.146.53.*
FROM 117.143.147.*