- 主题:请大家帮忙看看编辑是啥意思？
论文已经修回一次了（当时是两个外审专家），现在又给出了修订稿的审稿结果，只有一个审稿专家了，结果如下：
Reviewer #1: The authors have performed an extensive revision of their submission to the journal, accompanied by an also extensive response to the reviewers. However, as it stands, the revision per se - in terms of the improvements recommended by the reviewers in their initial review of the ms in question - is not adequate in terms of either depth, or critical detail, to grant publication to the journal.
The submission could be considered for publication to a "sister" journal, if the Editors of both the journal and the sister-journal agree.
这是说修订稿没达到审稿专家的要求，就想把稿子踢到另一个期刊去吗？可也没说清楚什么姊妹期刊啊。或者编辑是想拒稿，但又不好直接拒稿，就给了一个修改意见，让我知难而退？
我是不是应该联系编辑问清楚一些？
--
FROM 61.241.117.*
没有AE意见吗？看上去是拒稿。
如果AE说有条件接收，不过要搞定Reviewer #1的comment，那就看看上次意见是啥，写个十几页的答复。
【 在 shong 的大作中提到: 】
: 论文已经修回一次了（当时是两个外审专家），现在又给出了修订稿的审稿结果，只有一个审稿专家了，结果如下：
: Reviewer #1: The authors have performed an extensive revision of their submission to the journal, accompanied by an also extensive response to the reviewers. However, as it stands, the revision per se - in terms of the improvements recommended by the reviewers in their initial review of the ms in question - is not adequate in terms of either depth, or critical detail, to grant publication to the journal.
: The submission could be considered for publication to a "sister" journal, if the Editors of both the journal and the sister-journal agree.
: ...................
--
FROM 120.230.117.*
AE的意思是，修订稿没有满足Reviewer #1的要求，需要进一步更详细地回答这个审稿人关切的问题，他才能进一步决定。
可是审稿人当时提了十几个问题，也没说哪个问题没有回答好，难道是让我再捋一遍每一个问题？
【 在 jerrykid 的大作中提到: 】
: 没有AE意见吗？看上去是拒稿。
: 如果AE说有条件接收，不过要搞定Reviewer #1的comment，那就看看上次意见是啥，写个十几页的答复。
:
--
FROM 61.241.117.*
谢谢，我刚把上次的审稿意见又拿出来详细捋了一遍，感觉有一点没有完全按照审稿人的建议做，而是绕开了进行回答，估计惹得他不爽了
【 在 jerrykid 的大作中提到: 】
: 没有AE意见吗？看上去是拒稿。
: 如果AE说有条件接收，不过要搞定Reviewer #1的comment，那就看看上次意见是啥，写个十几页的答复。
:
--
FROM 61.241.117.*
你可以去骂街
【 在 shong 的大作中提到: 】
: 论文已经修回一次了（当时是两个外审专家），现在又给出了修订稿的审稿结果，只有一个审稿专家了，结果如下：
: Reviewer #1: The authors have performed an extensive revision of their submission to the journal, accompanied by an also extensive response to the reviewers. However, as it stands, the revision per se - in terms of the improvements recommended by the reviewers in their initial review of the ms in question - is not adequate in terms of either depth, or critical detail, to grant publication to the journal.
: The submission could be considered for publication to a "sister" journal, if the Editors of both the journal and the sister-journal agree.
: ...................
--
FROM 117.147.37.*
再改一次吧
水平不行，每次应对这些审稿专家都有想死的感觉
【 在 cannan 的大作中提到: 】
: 你可以去骂街
--
FROM 61.241.117.*
我个人觉得，别问编辑，就按部就班回答，然后在提交修改稿的时候和编辑强调一下写一下自己是本刊的忠实投稿人，不愿意发表在sister期刊上。
--
FROM 183.192.234.*
谢谢您，那我强调一下，这也是实际情况，我去年在期刊上投了3篇论文
最可气的是那个审稿人，不明说我在哪些问题上没有让他满意，而让我去猜
【 在 h0h0 的大作中提到: 】
: 我个人觉得，别问编辑，就按部就班回答，然后在提交修改稿的时候和编辑强调一下写一下自己是本刊的忠实投稿人，不愿意发表在sister期刊上。
--
FROM 61.241.117.*
就是你的文章的深度和意义不够发这个期刊。
【 在 shong 的大作中提到: 】
: 谢谢您，那我强调一下，这也是实际情况，我去年在期刊上投了3篇论文
: 最可气的是那个审稿人，不明说我在哪些问题上没有让他满意，而让我去猜
:
--
FROM 222.129.134.*
这种就属于编辑自己没主意，编辑既然发给你让二修，就是他不想让你改投他刊
但是呢，编辑自己也没主意或者没精力去看论文应该在哪些点上继续提高，所以就把个模糊意见发给你，让你自己琢磨着修改，大概这么个意思吧
【 在 shong 的大作中提到: 】
: 论文已经修回一次了（当时是两个外审专家），现在又给出了修订稿的审稿结果，只有一个审稿专家了，结果如下：
: Reviewer #1: The authors have performed an extensive revision of their submission to the journal, accompanied by an also extensive response to the reviewers. However, as it stands, the revision per se - in terms of the improvements recommended by the reviewers in their initial review of the ms in question - is not adequate in terms of either depth, or critical detail, to grant publication to the journal.
: The submission could be considered for publication to a "sister" journal, if the Editors of both the journal and the sister-journal agree.
: ...................
--
FROM 111.192.241.*