有没有区别看ICAO的定义。ICAO缔约国约定的是如何对待civail aircraft,不是state aircraft。
照你们这种不学无术还坚持立场决定事实的人看来，大概拦截军机和拦截民航客机也没有本质区别。


For ATM purposes and with reference to article 3(b) of the Chicago Convention, only aircraft used in military, customs and police services shall qualify as State Aircraft. Accordingly:

Aircraft on a military register, or identified as such within a civil register, shall be considered to be used in military service and hence qualify as State Aircraft;
Civil registered aircraft used in military, customs and police service shall qualify as State Aircraft;
Civil registered aircraft used by a State for other than military, customs and police service shall not qualify as State Aircraft.

【 在 somebody 的大作中提到: 】
: 本质上有个鸟区别
--
修改:stockfan FROM 219.239.227.*
FROM 219.239.227.*

动物学家
指鹿为马
还是 指鹿为马





【 在 stockfan 的大作中提到: 】
: 有没有区别看ICAO的定义。ICAO缔约国约定的是如何对待civail aircraft,不是state aircraft。
: 照你们这种不学无术还坚持立场决定事实的人看来，大概拦截军机和拦截民航客机也没有本质区别。
:
: ...................
--
FROM 120.85.149.*

傻孩子，看看缔约国的义务是对谁的。

(a) The contracting States recognize that every State must (a) refrain from resorting to the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight and that, in case of interception, the lives of persons on board and the safety of aircraft must not be endangered. This provision shall not be interpreted as modifying in any way the rights and obligations of States set forth in the Charter of the United Nations.


【 在 alanju 的大作中提到: 】
: 动物学家
: 指鹿为马
: 还是 指鹿为马
: ...................
--
FROM 219.239.227.*

所以要谴责美军啊
【 在 faa 的大作中提到: 】
: 美军炸死的平民可真不少
--
FROM 219.239.227.*

但是和民航无关
【 在 luoboxiong1 的大作中提到: 】
: 显然美国那次更严重，更不应该。
:
--
FROM 219.239.227.*