哦，是嘛，那你为啥不截全捏？

103 It is sufficient to note that, although the rules in issue in the main proceedings apply also to transfers between clubs belonging to different national associations within the same Member State and are similar to those governing transfers between clubs belonging to the same national association, they still directly affect players'access to the employment market in other Member States and are thus capable of impeding freedom of movement for workers. They cannot, thus, be deemed comparable to the rules on selling arrangements for goods which in Keck and Mithouard were held to fall outside the ambit of Article 30 of the Treaty (see also, with regard to freedom to provide services, Case C-384/93 Alpine Investments v Minister van Financien [1995] ECR I-1141, paragraphs 36 to 38).

104所指的造成自由雇佣的阻碍，是指它讲欧共体成员国球员，认定为外援，
因而受到外援名额限制的影响

这不还是指的国籍问题嘛（在CBA就是省籍）

【 在 zyd 的大作中提到: 】
: 问题是法院管的就是你的注册规则，反而不管俱乐部的雇用呀
: 104 Consequently, the transfer rules constitute an obstacle to freedom of movement for workers prohibited in principle by Article 48 of the Treaty.
: 就是足联的转会规则造成了自由雇用原则的障碍，因此违法。
: ...................
--
FROM 114.254.27.*