因为这条说的是不能和另一个判例比较。
你不想想
博斯曼是因为被法国足协认定为外援所以没有转会成功敦刻尔克的吗？根本不是

博斯曼的主诉求是 合同到期，收到了敦刻尔克的offer，不应该被足联因为培养费转会费的原因阻止自由转会。 外援认定是附带诉求。博斯曼根本没到被认定为外援那一步。



【 在 fromsky 的大作中提到: 】
: 哦，是嘛，那你为啥不截全捏？
: 103 It is sufficient to note that, although the rules in issue in the main proceedings apply also to transfers between clubs belonging to different national associations within the same Member State and are similar to those governing transfers between clubs belonging to the same national association, they still directly affect players'access to the employment market in other Member States and are thus capable of impeding freedom of movement for workers. They cannot, thus, be deemed comparable to the rules on selling arrangements for goods which in Keck and Mithouard were held to fall outside the ambit of Article 30 of the Treaty (see also, with regard to freedom to provide services, Case C-384/93 Alpine Investments v Minister van Financien [1995] ECR I-1141, paragraphs 36 to 38).
: 104所指的造成自由雇佣的阻碍，是指它讲欧共体成员国球员，认定为外援，
: ...................
--
修改:zyd FROM 222.212.202.*
FROM 222.212.202.*