我建议你不要掺和这个话题，免得被某ID利用。
这里的第二段恰恰就是我提的那4个问题中的最后一个。
另外参加本楼的42楼：
发信人: Myarmor (余哀), 信区: Bull
标 题: Re: 诡异的未来决定过去论，让人啼笑皆非
发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Jul 20 11:11:30 2022), 站内
: 坚持这个态概念——>因果不被倒置
这是确定无疑的！
我前面楼里说的“因果性被破坏”，
@fadels 总结得很准确，即：破坏的是“有因必有果、有果必有因”。
事实上，在专业术语里，为了精准和明确，
一般是将这称为“决定论被破坏”。
而微观因果性这个术语是专指：保持因果的先后次序和不能超光速。
这恰好就是我之前拷问某ID的4个问题中的最后一个。
【 在 ergodic 的大作中提到: 】
: 坚持这个态概念——>因果不被倒置
: 中间这块能不能具体说说呢
: 这个话题很刺激呀
: ...................
【 在 Psychnp 的大作中提到: 】
: No, quantum physics does not disprove causality.
: On the contrary, our best working quantum theory to date, quantum field theory, quite properly respects causality both on the macroscopic and on the microscopic level. Acausal (faster-than-light, backwards-in-time) influences are explicitly and precisely canceled out in the theory. This, in fact, is one of the major motivations behind quantum field theory.
: Some confusion arises because of misunderstandings surrounding the obvious nonlocality of the quantum theory, in particular the nonlocality of quantum entanglement. Therefore, it is important to reiterate that although entanglement may be counterintuitive, “spooky” even, it does not imply the transmission of information, the transmission of energy or momentum or other influences. It is simply a nonlocal manifestation of conservation laws, but no acausal signaling is involved.
: ...................
--
FROM 125.33.205.*