研究调查的是感染率，不是阳性率，就是曾经感染新冠的情况，所以英国才会出现150%的感染率。你是在质疑此研究毫无意义，你比研究者和期刊编审考虑的更周全么，还是仅仅因为自己无法接受现实而质疑？很多人被宣传洗脑，以为新冠真是感冒，只是一过性感染，但实际上新冠大概率更像乙肝或艾滋，一旦感染就是终身疾病。阳性率没意义，感染率才说明人群健康状况。

【 在 astrotf 的大作中提到: 】
: 发病率和某一时间段阳性率不是一个概念啊。。。
: 尤其你列出的12%这个，是2022年1月单月的数据。
: The greatest incidence of  reported COVID-19 disease was in January 2022, with a clear escalation which mirrors the generalized, global displacement of  the dominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant from Delta to Omicron, especially during the European winter (where respondent numbers were greatest). Most respondents reporting COVID-19 during the survey were in the two middle age bands (20 to 69 years inclusive) (Figure 9). In terms of  age bands, the 50 to 69 years age range reported the highest incidence of  COVID-19 disease (12.3% of respondents), followed by the 20 to 49 year group (10.7%), with considerably lower reporting (1.3% to 3.8%) of  suspected or confirmed COVID-19 disease among both the youngest and oldest age bands (Figure 10).
: ...................
--
FROM 115.171.23.*