【 以下文字转载自 QingJiao 讨论区 】
发信人: ibm2211 (ibm2211), 信区: QingJiao
标  题: 高校院所突破的关键还是在于圣贤管理模式圣贤教育
发信站: 水木社区 (Sat Apr 27 04:13:07 2024), 站内

这个问题古人给了答案了，
屡试不爽，
就是圣贤教育，
世界观摆正， 认识自然规律
大智慧，
圣人摆在上面，
把握全局，
搞什么kpi, 搞点辅助就可以了

以前的梅贻琦， 徐光启
张之洞，左宗棠
近代的丁石孙

米国应该基本就是这样搞法，
论文经费项目上课都看，
开会定一下绩效，不设硬指标

欧，米国的圣贤教育主要靠church
主要的私立学校里面的主要建筑都是church,
教育内容和国内古代圣贤教育内容惊人的相似。

下面是米帝某校的教授评价流程，
全程不搞硬性要求， 灵活务实

This College addendum to Penn State Policy AC40 applies to all tenured faculty in the College of Earth and Mineral Sciences

The College Faculty Performance Evaluation Committee (hereinafter called the FPE Committee) will review the materials (except the Department Head’s letter – this will be removed from the materials to allow the FPE Committee to make a judgement independent of the Department Head’s assessment) and prepare a written summary and assessment following this standard review process:

A committee member who is not from the reviewed faculty member’s department will write the first draft of the FPE Committee’s review statement. FPE committee members should expect to be responsible for preparing one or more reviews.
Another committee member, preferably from the reviewed faculty member’s department (unless there are noted conflicts of interest), should provide detailed comments on the first draft.
The final draft will be prepared by the assigned FPE member after considering comments from the whole committee.
The FPE Committee chair will produce the final versions of all evaluations for consistency and completeness.
The FPE Committee’s statement should reflect both the consensus and the breadth of opinion within the committee. Written comments of the FPE Committee should focus on accomplishment and future goals in accordance with college expectations. The evaluation should include a realistic appraisal of the candidate’s ability to achieve the proposed goals. The FPE Committee can include recommendations for action in support of a faculty member’s career goals. The file and accompanying letter will be forwarded to the Dean.  The Dean will receive the Department Head’s letter separately.

Faculty members may request to meet with the FPE Committee as part of the evaluation.  Such requests should be made through the Dean’s office in late January, after the Department Head has prepared her/his review. The FPE Committee may request a meeting with a faculty member to discuss the evaluation. After the review is submitted to the Dean, the FPE Committee may request a meeting with the Dean to discuss a given case. The Dean may also consult with either or both Department Head and/or the FPE Committee prior to finalizing her/his letter.

【 在 angusta 的大作中提到: 】
: 不管你内部什么评价奖惩体系，合理不合理，我高层只看你高校系统两个输出结果，一个是教育，是否有年轻人才可用。一个是技术突破，是否对国内核心产业做了contribution。
: @mizhahu




--
修改:ibm2211 FROM 116.3.122.*
FROM 116.3.122.*