口吻一样，结论一样，太无语了
Reviewer #1: This manuscript  does not meet the standards of importance,
novelty and broad interest required by ****.  The underlying physics
phenomena are not very original, and the manuscript does not put forward
new items of interest for an audience of physicists. There is overlap
with the existing literature, and not enough original contribution to
the subject to make this manuscript a stand-alone, outstanding paper.
The context, state-of-the-art and motivation are not sufficiently detailed,
and the approach seems to be quite technical  and very specific for a given
case, without a wider or more generalized exploration.  In summary, I cannot
recommend this manuscript for publication.
--
修改:apollovenus FROM 117.32.153.*
FROM 117.32.153.*

这也挺好使的

创新型不足

【 在 apollovenus (学而优则仕) 的大作中提到: 】
: 口吻一样，结论一样，太无语了
: Reviewer #1: This manuscript  does not meet the standards of importance,
: novelty and broad interest required by ****.  The underlying physics
: ...................
--
FROM 115.236.9.*

这应该被拉出来鞭尸，一点针对性都没有
【 在 apollovenus 的大作中提到: 】
: 口吻一样，结论一样，太无语了
: Reviewer #1: This manuscript  does not meet the standards of importance,
: novelty and broad interest required by ****.  The underlying physics
: ...................
--
FROM 106.121.68.*

杂志对审稿的要求模板必须面面俱到？

【 在 h0h0 (hoho||生活混乱，思维清晰) 的大作中提到: 】
: 能写到state of art也不错了
--
FROM 223.72.88.*

审稿人大概浏览一遍就知道稿件啥水平了，烂文章就不要浪费审稿人时间了。好好审一篇稿件要大半天，审稿人认为没有价值，完全没必要浪费时间提具体意见了。
【 在 Dingshuding 的大作中提到: 】
: 这应该被拉出来鞭尸，一点针对性都没有
--
FROM 117.136.0.*