The College Faculty Performance Evaluation Committee (hereinafter called the FPE Committee) will review the materials (except the Department Head’s letter – this will be removed from the materials to allow the FPE Committee to make a judgement independent of the Department Head’s assessment) and prepare a written summary and assessment following this standard review process:

A committee member who is not from the reviewed faculty member’s department will write the first draft of the FPE Committee’s review statement. FPE committee members should expect to be responsible for preparing one or more reviews.
Another committee member, preferably from the reviewed faculty member’s department (unless there are noted conflicts of interest), should provide detailed comments on the first draft.
The final draft will be prepared by the assigned FPE member after considering comments from the whole committee.
The FPE Committee chair will produce the final versions of all evaluations for consistency and completeness.
The FPE Committee’s statement should reflect both the consensus and the breadth of opinion within the committee. Written comments of the FPE Committee should focus on accomplishment and future goals in accordance with college expectations. The evaluation should include a realistic appraisal of the candidate’s ability to achieve the proposed goals. The FPE Committee can include recommendations for action in support of a faculty member’s career goals. The file and accompanying letter will be forwarded to the Dean.  The Dean will receive the Department Head’s letter separately.

Faculty members may request to meet with the FPE Committee as part of the evaluation.  Such requests should be made through the Dean’s office in late January, after the Department Head has prepared her/his review. The FPE Committee may request a meeting with a faculty member to discuss the evaluation. After the review is submitted to the Dean, the FPE Committee may request a meeting with the Dean to discuss a given case. The Dean may also consult with either or both Department Head and/or the FPE Committee prior to finalizing her/his letter.
【 在 xueche 的大作中提到: 】
: 如何定绩效？
--
FROM 116.3.122.*

百年育人
--
FROM 123.234.183.*

抓作假，
零容忍，

国外通常是
上面放个高人，
总揽全局，
所以当年大教育家无非就是这样的人，
蔡元培等等，
谁给发几个银元，

什么四大导师， 也没有什么杠杠


【 在 kickmao 的大作中提到: 】
: 人品咋考核呢？
: 义正词严抨击学术腐败的人，几年后自己学生要评院士就变了。
--
FROM 42.84.232.*

有缺陷，
像小米掏几百万画logo 这种情况
群众可能搞不清楚是利益输送还是正常交易


【 在 victd 的大作中提到: 】
:
: 群众监督（dazi报），纪委（第三方）介入  就可以。
--
FROM 116.3.122.*