原文说的是 任何阻碍 都不行
哪怕是广义理解，只要导致了阻碍了无合同自由转会的都不行
你是在扯白马非马吗？
法律如果判决不能杀野生动物，你是不是要说法律没说不能杀野生大象，判决法条没有大象两个字？只说了不能杀野生动物，所以可以杀大象？小学生也不会这么理解吧？
Article 48 of the EEC Treaty precludes the application of rules laid down by sporting associations, under which a professional footballer who is a national of one Member State may not, on the expiry of his contract with a club, be employed by a club of another Member State unless the latter club has paid to the former club a transfer, training or development fee.
The principle of subsidiarity,
even when interpreted broadly to the effect that intervention by Community authorities in the area of organization of sporting activities must be confined to what is strictly necessary, cannot lead to a situation in which the freedom of private associations to adopt sporting rules restricts the exercise of rights conferred on individuals by the Treaty.
另外 grouds判决基础这部分
是详细研究了足球背景的
注册这个概念是写在这部分的
法官是充分了解足联是怎么通过不给注册来阻止了博斯曼的转会的
The team fielded by each club consists of players who are registered by the national association to play for that club. Every professional player
must be registered as such with his national association and is entered as the present or former employee of a specific club.
同时转会的定义里就包括了 注册并能够为俱乐部比赛
registration of entitlement to play for a club, which is necessary for a player to be able to participate in official competitions. A transfer is defined as the transaction by which a player affiliated to an association obtains a change of club affiliation. If the transfer is temporary, the player continues to be affiliated to his club but is
registered as entitled to playfor another club.
也就是法条判的无合同的自由转会，转会的定义就包括足联必须给他注册，上场比赛的权利，而不是你扯的去看门也叫转会。你以为以法律为生的法官律师会像你这么傻吗
后面就更扯了
我们谈的是法理
主体是国家，民众，而不是商业组织
你是说欧美几十年前，或者至少二十五年前确认的基本人权，
我们不该给雇员因为某个商业公司起步晚？
作为社会主义国家，我们要在保护雇员权利方面落后资本主义国家几十年？
我们的基本法理是偏向资本家的吗？
作为社会主义新中国教育出来的我们，在这种基本人权（博斯曼的法条里几次强调判罚的基础就是这个）问题上，去偏向资本公司？
屁股在哪边？
连腐朽的资本主义国家都被迫做出的有利雇员的裁定
先进的社会主义国家的政府法院却偏袒资本家，这就是你说的合理性？
【 在 fromsky 的大作中提到: 】
:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61993CJ0415: 博斯曼裁决的全文我撂这，
: 你只要在里面找出注册权仨字儿就行，不用东扯西拉
: ...................
--
修改:zyd FROM 222.212.202.*
FROM 222.212.202.*