问题是博斯曼和列日合同到期了，从法律上没有合同就没有束缚力。

那为啥敦刻尔克还要和列日谈转会？因为当时的足联的规则不谈博斯曼上不了场。上不了场敦刻尔克就不会雇用了。

博斯曼起诉是列日和足联一起起诉的
法院的判决就是废除了这个足联的规定了呀

后面二十几年，俱乐部就得在合同到期前就得谈续约或者转会
一旦合同到期就是免费走人自由转会，根本不需要和前俱乐部谈了

百度查不出，你在bing上搜搜呢？
比如https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11096/10100134/how-the-bosman-rule-changed-football-20-years-on
The ruling allowed a player to leave a club on a free transfer as soon as his contract expired, meaning they had leverage to demand huge signing-on fees and salaries from new clubs to make up for the absent transfer fee.
法案允许球员合同到期就能免费转会。

“Once the European Court of Justice ruled that clubs no longer had to pay transfer fees after the expiration of a player’s contract, all hell broke loose. Suddenly it was a free-for-all.” -Sir Alex Ferguson, 2015
弗格森的理解,---合同到期就不需要转会费，简单的说法院判决就是列日连去谈转会价格的资格都没有。

https://bloomsburyfootball.com/news/2020/5/26/moments-in-football-history-the-bosman-ruling
The court’s ruling would be monumental; the contemporary transfer system in place in European football was deemed to have placed an unfair restriction on workers. On 15 December 1995, the court ruled in Bosman’s favour, and EU footballers were given the right to a free transfer at the expiration of their contracts, so long as the player was moving from one club situated in the EU to another similarly situated club.
当时的转会限制被法院认为是对球员不公平的，之后的欧洲足球运动员合同到期就能自由转会。

另外博斯曼法案之前外援又不是不能注册
只是数量限制
敦刻尔克准备签博斯曼的时候，手里明显有外援名额。
【 在 fromsky 的大作中提到: 】
: 再跟你讲点你的百度百科查不出来的东西
: 博斯曼法案是怎么个因果，为什么是怎么个裁决文本，垃圾百度百科根本讲不清楚
: 实际上，不是博斯曼的母队不让他转会，
: ...................
--
修改:zyd FROM 222.212.202.*
FROM 222.212.202.*